romeo and juliet play script and modern definition of accounting

With precedents in Victorian philology and Russian formalism, the digital humanities which embrace the quantitative analysis that traditional humanities scholarship shuns is not particularly new. To this day, the humanist's suspicion and rejection of scientific ideas and methodologies he or she may not understand remains a central challenge to the digital humanities, which has involved several sub-fields over the years, including humanities computing, distant reading, and culturomics. So the great edifice of modern physics goes up, and the majority of the cleverest people in the western world have about as much insight into it as their neolithic ancestors would have had. Yet I was asking something which is the scientific equivalent of: Have you read a work of Shakespeare's?. The response was cold: it was also negative. Once or twice I have been provoked and have asked the company how many of them could describe the Second Law of Thermodynamics. His well-known critique of the humanists who do not understand the science they reject actually climaxes in an allusion to Shakespeare: A good many times I have been present at gatherings of people who, by the standards of the traditional culture, are thought highly educated and who have with considerable gusto been expressing their incredulity at the illiteracy of scientists. Snow identified in 1956 as the problem of the 'two cultures'. Statistics in the Digital Humanities: Humanities Computing, Distant Reading, and Culturomicsīehind this tension between qualitative and quantitative thinking is what C.P. It might even be painfully obvious, but it needs to be said because it tempers the claims of both the giddy grad student who believes computer-aided analysis can revolutionize literary studies (it can't) and the befuddled professor emeritus who fears computers will de-humanize the humanities (they won't). This is not, I suspect, a controversial statement. In other words, quantitative data can help us understand where we need to direct qualitative analysis, but statistics won't interpret things for us. Statistics are best used in Shakespeare studies to ask questions but not to answer them.

I make the deflationary case that statistics do indeed have a part to play in both our classrooms and our scholarship, but it is not a particularly revolutionary role. This essay assesses the role of quantitative data in Shakespeare studies.

Romeo and juliet play script and modern definition of accounting